论文部分内容阅读
虽然目前中国画坛依然有人在画“新文人画”,有些画展也依然打着“新文人画的名号,但是恐怕谁也不会否认这个事实:“新文人画”这个提法以及围绕着这个提法的种种争论也已日益成为一种搁置起来的旧时话题。 然而,“新文人画”的提法以及由此而产生的种种争论所涉及的问题,并没有得到真正的解决。 一提起“新文人画”这个概念,人们会想当然地将它与传统文人画联系起来加以核对和考察。其实,这种核对和考察一开始就停留在表面层次,而从未能够真正深究下去。比如关于传统文人画画家的社会地位和身份（“士人”、“士大夫”）的规定,关于传统文人画画家的学识修养（“读万卷书”）的规定,关于传统文人画的审美风格（“写意”,“平淡”、“雅拙”、“秀润”）以及“书画同法”、“诗画相融”等等审美特征的规定。当人们拿这些规定的尺度和标准去衡量和比较“新文人画”时,似乎极容易找到这两者之间丝丝缕缕的关联,你能说“新文人”没有相应的社会地位和身份吗?你能肯定地说“新文人”一点也不具备必要的学识修养吗?你能确切地说“新文人画”不具有类似的审美风格和审美特征吗?显然不是也不能这样笼统地说。正如有些评论家所指出的那样,“新
Although there are still some people who are still painting “new literati paintings” in the traditional Chinese painting circles, some exhibitions still hold the title of “new literati paintings”, but I am afraid no one will deny the fact that the term “new literati paintings” However, the problems involved in the formulation of “new literati paintings” and the various controversies arising therefrom have not been solved in real terms. New literati painting “concept, people will take it for granted with traditional literati paintings to be checked and inspected.In fact, this check and investigation from the outset to stay at the surface level, but never really go deep.For example, on the traditional The social status and identity of the literati painters (”scholars,“ ”scholar“), the regulations on the literacy and cultivation of traditional literati painters (”Reading Books“), the aesthetic style of traditional literati paintings ”,“ Plain ”,“ Ya Zhuo ”,“ Xiurun ”), as well as aesthetic characteristics such as“ Painting and Calligraphy, ”“ Poetry and Painting, ”etc. When people take these rules Scale and standards to measure and compare the “new scholar painting”, it seems very easy to find the faint relationship between the two, can you say “new scholar” does not have the appropriate social status and identity? You can be sure To say that the “new literati” does not possess the necessary knowledge and accomplishments at all? Can you say exactly that “the new literati painting” does not have the similar aesthetic and aesthetic characteristics? Obviously it can not and can not be generalized, just as some critics As pointed out, "new