十年改革,计划内分配逐年减少,计划外购销活跃,市场交易日趋广泛;“双轨”格局在一定程度上搞活了产需企业,并使企业在市场的舞台上经受了锻炼,对市场活动在心理上、经济上有了一定的适应能力,但就地方水泥流通体制的现状而言,可以说是计划内和计划外的“两套车”各行其“道”。计划内统收统支,分配调拨;计划外自购自销,自由买卖。近几年,在解决“双轨”摩擦的实践中,我们觉得“同一销价,差价返还”的办法对水泥不那么“灵”,其原因在于,计划内水泥比重并不因“返差”而逐步缩小,计划外水泥价格也不随“同价”而趋向合理。计划内、外的“双轨”运行没能发展为有计划的水泥市 The “two track” pattern has to some extent revitalized the production and demand-oriented enterprises and allowed the enterprises to undergo the exercise on the stage of the market, and the market activity in the Psychologically and economically have a certain degree of adaptability, but in terms of the status quo of local cement circulation system, it can be said that planned and unscheduled “two sets of vehicles” go its own way. In the plan, all taxes and remittances will be collected and reallocated. Allotments will be allocated and sold out of the plan. In recent years, in the practice of resolving the “two-track” friction, we feel that the “same selling price and postback” approach is less “spiritual” for cement because the proportion of cement in the plan does not fall due to “backtracking” Gradually narrowing, unplanned cement prices do not with the “same price” and tend to be reasonable. The planned “two-track” operation outside and inside the project failed to develop into a planned cement city