关于木心的《文学回忆录》其实不太好谈,因为它似乎不成体系,显得非常斑斓、纷纭、驳杂。但是恰恰是这种不成体系,反而成为优点,流露出它的许多有价值的文学信息。这种有价值的文学信息不在于木心讲述古今中外文学史本身,因为文学史本身只是代表了一个客观传承,木心的讲述正像他的学生陈丹青说的,经常游离于和旁逸斜出于照本宣科的讲述,加入了木心的情绪和观点,加入了一些题外 The literary memoir about Mu Xin is actually not very talkative because it does not seem to be a system that looks very gorgeous, controversial and complicated. However, it is precisely this fragmentation that turns out to be an advantage, revealing many of its valuable literary messages. This valuable literary information is not about Mu Xin’s history of literature at all times and in all countries. Because literary history itself represents only one objective heritage, Mu Xin’s telling is exactly what his student Chen Danqing said. In the narrative of this propaganda, joined the mood and view of wooden heart, joined a number of questions