论文部分内容阅读
本文研究对文本的指称词语作为互文标记的可能性,通过分析话语中的这种指称来揭示互文语篇的组织结构和文本关系。话语中的指称可分为外指和内指,内指又可进一步分为话语他指(元他指)和话语自指(元自指)。其中话语他指是文本之间对话互动、形成互文关系的语言机制,而指称互文本的指称词则起到了识别文本之间互文关系的作用,可以视为互文关系的一种标记。根据互文本之间的时空位置,话语他指所形成的互文关系可分为同域文本间的互文关系和跨域文本间的互文关系。本文借用实示和指称的对立,分别从通名、专名和代词三个方面分别进行了讨论。最后在归纳互文指称标记的基础上,将问题推进到语言学视野中语篇的互文研究应该持有的基本原则上。
This paper studies the possibility of using the alphanumeric text as the intertext markup and reveals the organizational structure and the textual relationship of the intertextual discourse by analyzing such allegations in discourse. The allegations in discourse can be divided into the outer and inner fingers, the inner fingers can be further divided into discourse He refers to (Yuan He refers to) and discourse self refers to (Yuan Zi Zhi). The discourse he refers to is a language mechanism of intertextual interaction and intertextual relations, while the allegation of the alleged intertext plays the role of identifying intertextual relations between texts and can be regarded as a marker of intertextual relations. According to the space-time position between the intertexts, the intertextual relations that he refers to in the discourse can be divided into the intertextual relations among the texts in the same domain and the intertextual relations among the cross-domain texts. This article borrows the contradiction between actual and allegation, and discusses respectively from three aspects: generic name, proper name and pronoun. Finally, on the basis of induction of intertextual reference markers, the problem is advanced to the basic principle that intertextual research on discourse should hold in linguistics.