论文部分内容阅读
目前,国际上许多学者认为国际商事仲裁应依“非地方化”理论来确定具体的程序规则,他们认为当事人对仲裁地的选择纯属偶然,不能仅以此当然适用仲裁地的程序法。笔者认为“非地方化”理论虽有其合理的一面,但是在实际操作中存在很大的缺陷,若完全依当事人自治来确定仲裁的程序规则,则将使仲裁脱离特定的国内法,使仲裁的法律地位无法确定,并且得不到国家法律的支持。因而,“非地方化”仲裁在现阶段来讲,并不值得提倡。
At present, many scholars in the world think that international commercial arbitration should be based on “non-localized ” theory to determine the specific rules of procedure, they believe that the parties to the arbitration ground choice is purely by chance, can not be the sole basis of the procedural law . Although the “non-localized” theory has its reasonable side, the author believes that there is a big flaw in the actual operation. If the procedural rules of arbitration are determined solely by the party autonomy, the arbitration will be separated from the specific domestic law, So that the legal status of arbitration can not be determined and is not supported by national law. Thus, “non-localized” arbitration is not worth promoting at this stage.