论文部分内容阅读
张廷玉《明史·礼志》是迄今影响最大的专门记载明代礼制的史志文献,但其中也存在诸多史实讹误,这大大影响了其可信度和史料价值。经据《明实录》、《明会典》、《皇明典礼志》、《昭代典则》、《太常续考》、《礼部志稿》等文献考证,可知该《志》中华书局1974年点校本第47—53卷仍然存在史实讹误21处。其致误之直接原因,大致有脱漏、衍文、字形相近而误等情形;但根本原因还是缘于编纂、刻印和传抄者的疏忽与粗心。
Zhang Mingyu “Ming Shi Etiquette” is by far the most influential historical record of the Ming Dynasty rites, but there are also many historical errors, which greatly affected its credibility and historical value. According to the records of Ming Shi Lu, Ming Hui Dian, Huang Ming Code, Zhaode Code, Too Continuous Test, and Li Zhi Zhi Man, we can see Zhong Zhi Shu Ying Shu Years of school-based volumes 47-53 there are still 21 historical facts corruption. The direct cause of the error is roughly the case of omission, derivative, similar glyphs, and the like. However, the root cause is due to the negligence and carelessness of the editors, engravers and transferees.