如果在二十世纪,人们要找出一位像克劳塞维茨那样伟大的军事学大师的话,富勒很可能是当之无愧的人物。所不同的是克劳塞维茨以十九世纪军事战略思想的集大成者饮誉世界,富勒则以战争史上划时代事件的预言家名扬天下。第一次世界大战结束时,由于刚刚问世的新式武器——坦克在松姆河、康布莱、艾敏斯三次战役中的效果并不尽如人意,在人们普遍对它的前景持保 If in the twentieth century people were to find a great master of military science like Clausewitz, Fuller might well be a well-deserved figure. The difference is that Clausewitz was renowned in the world as a master of military strategic thinking in the 19th century, and Fuller made a name for himself as a prophet of epochal events in the history of war. At the end of the First World War, due to the new weapon just emerging-the effectiveness of the tanks in the three battles of the Buttermilk, Cambre and Emins was not satisfactory and it was widely held in view of its prospects