作为史学典籍,《史记》与《汉书》同为二十四史之一,并且两部作品也同时处在前四史之列,对史学发展起重要影响。尽管如此,两部作品内容与体例、编纂方法略有不同,更重要的是两部作品的作者司马迁与班固的史学思想有着很深刻的差异。因此,从两部史书具体内容来看可以使我们更容易比较两位史学大家的思想不同之处。 As a historical text, “Historical Records” and “Han Dynasty” are one of the twenty-four histories, and the two works are also listed in the first four histories at the same time, which have an important influence on the development of historiography. Nevertheless, the contents and methods of the two works are slightly different from the methods of compilation. What is more important is that there is a profound difference between Sima Qian and Baogu’s historiographical thinking. Therefore, judging from the specific contents of the two historical books, we can more easily compare the ideological differences between the two historians.