论文部分内容阅读
革命转变问题上的认识演变,很大程度源于用经典著作的现成结论取代了党历来对中国国情的深刻把握。官方修史工作曾力图反映党在历史认识上已有的前进,却难脱因袭旧说之羁绊。旧说叙史拘泥于社会主要矛盾转变、阶级关系变动等惯常概念,而不去考察生产力的实践基础,不是从物质实践出发来评判历史进程,以致把后来发生变化的主观认识,说成客观历史原本就是那样的。这不符合新中国成立后党领导人民建设新民主主义经济社会并成绩斐然的历史本质。在党的《历史决议》和改革开放以来党对历史认识前进的基础上,研究者进一步深化对转变问题历史过程和历史经验的认识,是理论前进和研究方法前进的必然要求。
The evolution of understanding on the issue of revolutional change stems largely from the fact that the Party has always replaced the deep grasp of China’s national conditions with the ready-made conclusions of classic writings. Officials’ history work has tried hard to reflect the progress the party has made in its historical understanding, but it is hard to avoid the fetters of the old saying. The old saying that the history of the historians is rigidly based on the customary concepts of major social contradictions and changes in class relations, rather than examining the practical basis of productive forces, not judging the historical process from the material practice, so as to turn subjective knowledge of the later changes into objective history It was like that. This is not in line with the historic nature of the well-accomplished achievements of the post-CPC leadership in building a new-democratic economy and society in New China. On the basis of the party’s “historic resolution” and the progress of the Party’s understanding of history since the reform and opening up, it is inevitable for researchers to further deepen their understanding of the historical process and historical experience of the issue of change.