论文部分内容阅读
邹惠渝和张凤春两位先生所撰写的“长苞铁杉和铁杉属数量分类的研究”一文(见《南京林业大学学报》,1996,20(1):43-47),至少存在以下3个问题值得商榷:一是取材欠完整,二是聚类方法单一,三是结合线计算错误,据本文重新核算,《邹文》的结论有误。
Zou Hui-yu and Zhang Feng-chun, “a study on the quantitative classification of Hepidha and Hemlock” (see Journal of Nanjing Forestry University, 1996, 20 (1): 43-47), there are at least three The question is worth discussing: First, the lack of access to complete, the second is a single clustering method, the third is a combination of line calculation error, according to this recalculation, “Zou” conclusion is wrong.