近年来,随着各地原始瓷器的不断出土以及南方原始瓷窑的发现,对于中国陶瓷考古的研究逐渐受到重视。目前,学术界关于原始瓷的起源问题讨论激烈,主要集中于“南方起源说”与“北方起源说”两种观点。北方地区出土原始瓷数量多,分布地域广,主要集中于河南、山东、陕西、河北等“中原文化圈”及其附近。器形较为统一,与当地陶器、青铜礼器近似,胎质、釉色等也已有进步趋势。并且北方原始瓷主要出土于高等级的建筑遗址与墓葬中,当与其珍贵性有关。另外,将其与南方出土的相比,既有共性,又有区别。北方地区出土的商周原始瓷其产地主要是南方地区,但是不排除北方当地烧造的可能。 In recent years, with the continuous unearthed primitive porcelain throughout the country and the discovery of the original porcelain kiln in the south, the research on the Chinese ceramics archeology has been paid more and more attention. At present, there is a heated discussion in the academic community about the origin of primitive porcelain, mainly focusing on two points of view: “Origin of the South” and “Origin of the North”. Northern China unearthed a large number of primitive porcelain, distributed in a wide range of areas, mainly in Henan, Shandong, Shaanxi, Hebei and other “Central Plains cultural circle” and its vicinity. Shape is more uniform, with the local pottery, bronze ritual approximation, tire quality, glaze, etc. have also been a trend. And the primitive porcelain of the north is mainly unearthed in high-grade architectural sites and tombs, when related to its preciousness. In addition, compared with the unearthed in the south, there are both commonalities and differences. The origin of the Shang and Zhou original porcelain unearthed in the northern region is mainly the southern region, but does not rule out the possibility of local burning in the north.