论文部分内容阅读
埃伦·伍德认为,马克思在1859年使用的“基础-上层建筑”隐喻被“正统”马克思主义所曲解,这种曲解不仅重复了资产阶级意识形态的错误,而且给20世纪围绕这一问题的理论纷争制造了“术语约束”。汤普森试图打破“约束”的努力使其备受批评,但极富价值。因此,在借鉴汤普森思想的基础上,伍德重构了经济基础和上层建筑的关系,即经济基础和上层建筑不是彼此刚性分离的两个领域,而是由社会关系及其形式构成的一个连续的结构,二者之间不是机械的决定关系,而是有机的联系。
Ellen Wood argues that Marx’s “meta-superstructure” metaphor, used in 1859, is misinterpreted by “orthodox” Marxism. This distortion not only duplicates the error of bourgeois ideology but also gives the 20th century a The theoretical controversy on this issue has created “terminology constraints.” Thompson’s attempts to break the “constraint” made it highly criticized, but extremely valuable. Therefore, on the basis of Thompson’s thought, Wood reconstructs the relationship between economic foundation and superstructure, that is, the economic foundation and the superstructure are not rigidly separated from each other, but are formed by a series of social relations and their forms Structure, the relationship between the two is not a mechanical decision, but an organic link.