论文部分内容阅读
本文作者通过逐个分析并反驳反女性主义法学对女性主义法学的诘难,为女性主义法学进行辩护,指出女性主义法学是对法律基本概念及其关系和原则进行分析,特别是以父权制作为中心命题的一个法学流派;抵制父权制是所有女性主义法学的共同特点,也是其区别其他法理学的个性特点;并且以“法律外围者”为其基本立场姿态的女性主义法学有着独特的重要哲学意义,女性主义法学作为一种法学流派具有合法性。
By analyzing and refuting anti-feminist jurisprudence’s feuds on feminist jurisprudence one by one, the author defends feminist jurisprudence, pointing out that feminist law is an analysis of the basic concepts of law and its relations and principles, especially patriarchy as the central proposition A school of jurisprudence; boycott of patriarchy is a common characteristic of all feminist jurisprudence and also a distinguishing feature of other jurisprudence; and feminist jurisprudence whose “stance” is its “basic position” has unique and important philosophical meanings, Feminist jurisprudence as a school of law has legitimacy.