论文部分内容阅读
去年,鲁迅先生之子周海婴出版了《鲁迅与我七十年》的著作,“再说几句”透露了罗稷南问“鲁迅如果活着会如何”以及毛泽东对此的回答。周海婴心中十分忐忑,“由于这段对话属于‘孤证’,又事关重大,我撰写之后又抽掉”。幸而有王元化先生的鼓励,“再说几句”才成为《鲁迅与我七十年》书中的一部分。此书出版后,一石激起千重浪。谢泳先生在《文史精华》2002年第6期发表文章认为,在1957年那样的形势下,毛泽东以他政治家的身份,说出罗稷南所讲那样的话,在逻辑上不合理。事已至此,“孤证”也几乎无据了,似乎“再说几句”也该成多余的几句了。
Last year, Zhou Haiying, son of Mr. Lu Xun, published a book entitled “Lu Xun and I Seventy Years,” and “a few more words” revealed how Luo Jnan asked if “Lu Xun would live” and Mao’s reply. Zhou Haiying heart very shy, “Since this dialogue is ’solitary card’, but also related to the major, I wrote after pumping away.” Fortunately, Mr. Wang Yuanhua’s encouragement, “a few more” became “Lu Xun and I seventy years,” the book part. After the book was published, a stone aroused thousands of waves. In his article “Essence of Literature and History”, No. 6, 2002, Mr. Xie Yong holds the view that under such circumstances as 1957, Mao Zedong, in his capacity as a politician, said that what Luo Jianan said was illegitimate. Things have been done so far, “solitary card” is almost no evidence, it seems “to say a few words” should become a few extra words.