杨沫的《青春之歌》在出版之后广受好评,但是一年之后,郭开发表文章对其展开批评,从而引发了对《青春之歌》的大讨论。五六十年代,学者们普遍从“政治阶级”的视角来解读,从而忽视了作品自身的艺术价值;七八十年代,《青春之歌》开始走出文革的冷遇,研究者们又将视角投放到文本内部进行分析和讨论;八十年代末至九十年代的中后期,《青春之歌》的研究达到了前所未有的繁盛状况,从多元化的视角给与我们更为新鲜和丰富的阐释。 Yang Mo’s “song of youth” was widely acclaimed after it was published, but a year later Guo Kuo published an article criticizing it, triggering a big discussion of “Song of Youth.” In the 1950s and 1960s, scholars generally read from the perspective of “political class”, thus neglecting the artistic value of the works themselves. In the seventies and eighties, “Song of Youth” began to walk out of the Cold War of the Cultural Revolution and the researchers returned Perspective into the text for analysis and discussion; the late 1980s to the mid-90s, the “Song of Youth” reached an unprecedented prosperity, from a wide range of perspective to give us more fresh and rich Explain.