论文部分内容阅读
目的:对介入治疗消化道出血的临床疗效进行系统探讨。方法:以我院收治的68例消化道出血患者作为本次研究对象,按照治疗方法的不同分成常规组和介入组,均为34例;常规组采用常规药物或一般外科手术治疗,介入组则采用血管介入治疗,对比分析两组的临床疗效。结果:在治疗完成后均随访6个月,介入组的临床总有效率达到97.1%,明显高于常规组的85.3%,差异显著,有统计意义(P<0.05);介入组的复发率要低于常规组,差异有统计意义(P<0.05)。结论:在消化道出血临床治疗中,采取血管介入治疗的临床效果显著,可有效改善患者病情,促进患者康复,且复发率低,值得临床推广和应用。
Objective: To investigate the clinical efficacy of interventional treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding. Methods: Sixty-eight patients with gastrointestinal bleeding admitted to our hospital were divided into routine group and intervention group according to the different treatment methods, all of them were 34 cases. The conventional group was treated with conventional drugs or general surgery, while the intervention group Vascular intervention was used to compare the clinical efficacy of the two groups. Results: After 6 months of follow-up, the total effective rate of the intervention group was 97.1%, significantly higher than that of the conventional group (85.3%), with significant difference (P <0.05). The recurrence rate in the intervention group was Lower than the conventional group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). Conclusion: In the clinical treatment of gastrointestinal bleeding, the clinical effect of vascular intervention is significant, which can effectively improve the patient’s condition, promote the recovery of patients, and the recurrence rate is low, worthy of clinical promotion and application.