“我们只有一个地球!”曾几何时,柴静的雾霾调查视频一度引发网络舆情热潮。生活在当下,资源的紧张、生态的恶化,环境恶化备受关注。生态环境不仅关乎我们每一个人,更关乎子孙后代。但是多年以来,对于环境犯罪的打击困难重重,一方面犯罪是否成立,往往取决于行政法的相关规定;另一方面犯罪是否既遂,往往难以科学界定与把握。难题一:取证难。目前环境刑事案件中,取证一般有两种渠道,一是公安机关直接受理群众举报,二是由行政机关在办理查处环境污染破坏行政案件中发现后,移交司法机关。无论 “We only have one Earth! ” Once upon a time, Chai Jing fog investigation video once triggered a wave of Internet public opinion. Living in the moment, resources are strained, ecological deterioration, the deterioration of the environment has drawn much attention. The ecological environment is not only for each of us, but also for future generations. However, over the years, it is very difficult to combat environmental crime. On the one hand, whether crime is established or not depends on the relevant provisions of administrative law. On the other hand, it is often difficult to define and grasp science scientifically. One problem: evidence is difficult. At present, there are two types of evidence collection in environmental criminal cases. First, the public security organ directly accepts reports from the masses. Second, the administrative organ turns over the judicial organs after it finds out in handling administrative cases of environmental pollution. regardless