论文部分内容阅读
目的研究并探讨不同助产护理方式在无保护会阴接生中的应用效果。方法选取2013年1月~2016年8月期间我院产科收治且实施无保护会阴接生的100例产妇作为研究对象,采取单盲随机分组方法将患者分为两组,每组50例,对照组实施常规助产护理,观察组实施优质助产护理,比较两组产妇的无保护会阴接生成功率、会阴完整率、产程时间、产后疼痛评分、产后出血量以及新生儿窒息率。结果观察组产妇的无保护会阴接生成功率、会阴完整率均远远高于对照组(P<0.05),其产程时间明显缩短(P<0.05),产后疼痛评分、产后出血量明显降低(P<0.05);观察组新生儿的窒息率相比于对照组明显降低(P<0.05)。结论在产妇无保护会阴接生过程中实施优质助产护理,有利于保证无保护会阴接生的成功,改善母婴结局。
Objective To study and discuss the effect of different midwifery nursing methods in unprotected perineal intercourse. Methods From January 2013 to August 2016, 100 maternal women who received unprotected perineal delivery in obstetrics and gynecology hospital from January 2013 to August 2016 were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into two groups according to the single-blind randomized method: 50 cases in each group, The implementation of routine midwifery care, observation group implementation of high-quality midwifery care, two groups of maternal unprotected perineal shunting power, perineal completeness, labor time, postpartum pain score, postpartum hemorrhage and neonatal asphyxia. Results In the observation group, the unprotected perineal birth rate and perineal complete rate were much higher than those in the control group (P <0.05), and the duration of labor was significantly shorter (P <0.05). Postpartum pain scores and postpartum hemorrhage were significantly lower (P <0.05). The asphyxia rate of newborns in observation group was significantly lower than that in control group (P <0.05). Conclusions The implementation of high-quality midwifery care in unprotected perineal delivery is conducive to the success of unprotected perineal delivery and the improvement of maternal and infant outcomes.