论文部分内容阅读
随着我国对外开放的深入和跨国犯罪案件的不断增多,无司法协助条约下司法引渡的替代性途径进入人们的视野。在现行情况下,《中华人民共和国引渡法》和国际间打击共同犯罪协助条约都远远满足不了社会实践需要,因此更好的发挥无司法协助条约下司法引渡的替代性途径,才能更好的打击跨国犯罪。根据无司法协助条约下司法引渡的替代性途径相关概念等理论基础,结合常规司法引渡的替代性途径,我国应该把劝返作为我国实践中的首选,并且少用慎用非常规司法引渡的替代性途径。
With the deepening of China’s opening to the outside world and the ever-increasing number of transnational crimes, an alternative approach to judicial extradition under the Treaty of Mutual Legal Assistance enters the field of vision. Under the current circumstances, the “Extradition Law of the People’s Republic of China” and the international treaty to fight common crimes are far from meeting the needs of social practice. Therefore, we can make better use of alternatives to judicial extradition without a treaty on mutual legal assistance Combat transnational crime. According to the theoretical basis of alternative concepts related to judicial extradition without the treaty of judicial assistance and other alternative ways of judicial extradition, our country should regard exhortation and return as the first choice in practice and less frequently with the alternative of unconventional extradition Sexual way.