论文部分内容阅读
在避风港规则下,网络服务提供者对版权保护采取中立的事后执行模式,但在版权人寻求行政执法和立法游说的过程中,有逐渐被各种替代性规则所取代的趋势,网络服务提供者逐渐被强化了民事责任(如断网禁令)、行政责任(如没收域名)以及刑事责任的承担,并被试图强制采纳过滤技术等事前预防措施,极有可能改变其不负事先审查义务的现行规则。但是,版权保护的成本不能只由开创了新市场的技术开发者来承担。因此,新的法律规则应该在不改变第三方侵权责任规则的基础上,规定网络服务提供者在提供服务的过程中,包括在实施商业模式的技术设计与运营过程中,对其服务可能涉及到的版权人利益承担必要的注意义务。
Under the rule of safe haven, ISPs take a neutral ex post implementation model for copyright protection. However, as copyright lawmakers seek administrative law enforcement and legislative lobbying, there is a trend of gradually being replaced by various alternative rules. Network service providers Increasingly, civil liability (such as breaking the ban), administrative liability (such as confiscation of domain names) and criminal liability are being gradually reinforced, and attempts to impose precautionary measures such as filtering techniques are highly likely to change the existing burden of foreseeable obligations rule. However, the cost of copyright protection can not be borne solely by technology developers who have pioneered new markets. Therefore, the new legal rules should not change the third party tort liability rules, based on the provision of network service providers in the process of providing services, including the implementation of the business model of the technical design and operation of its services may be involved Copyright owner bear the necessary attention.