论文部分内容阅读
目的:对比分析自制清热止咳糖浆与澳特斯小儿止咳露治疗小儿支气管肺炎的临床疗效。方法:两组患者均采用抗病毒、抗炎、止咳化痰等治疗手段,观察组60例患者服用自制清热止咳糖浆,对照组60例患者服用澳特斯小儿止咳露。两组患者疗程均为一周。对比分析治疗后的症状、体征消失时间以及治愈率。结果:两组患者的治愈率均达85.0%以上,对照组患者在咳嗽消失时间和罗音持续时间上均长于观察组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。在治疗期间,对照组患者无恶心、呕吐等不良反应出现;观察组有1例患者出现恶心的不良反应。结论:自制小儿止咳糖浆的整体效果与澳特斯小儿止咳露相当,治愈率无统计学差异,但在缩短咳嗽时间和罗音持续时间上比澳特斯小儿止咳露更佳,仅1例患者出现恶心的不良反应,可以在临床推广应用。
OBJECTIVE: To compare and analyze the curative effect of homemade Cough Reliever Syrup and Orthopedic cough syrup on children with bronchopneumonia. Methods: The two groups of patients were treated with anti-virus, anti-inflammatory and cough-resolving phlegm. 60 patients in observation group took self-made heat-relieving cough syrup and 60 patients in control group took Orthopedic cough syrup. Two groups of patients were treated for one week. Comparative analysis of the symptoms after treatment, signs disappear time and cure rate. Results: The cure rate of both groups was over 85.0%. The control group had longer cough disappearance time and duration of rales than the observation group, the difference was statistically significant (P <0.05). During the treatment, patients in the control group showed no nausea, vomiting and other adverse reactions; one patient in the observation group showed nausea and adverse reactions. Conclusion: The overall effect of self-made pediatric cough syrup is similar to that of Orthopedic pediatric cough syrup, and the cure rate is not statistically different, but it is better than the Orthopedic cough syrup in shortening cough duration and rales duration. Only 1 patient Nausea appeared adverse reactions, can be applied in clinical practice.