实际上,现在我们还是坚持以公有经济为主。从逻辑上来说,在公有经济为主的这样一个基本经济制度下,国企和民企怎么可能公平竞争,怎么可能有平等的机会?就好像我有几个儿子,有亲生的儿子,有非亲的儿子,你们可以跟我说,你应该对你的亲儿子和非亲儿子同等平等地对待。我会把你的话看得很认真,可是我真的会平等对待我的亲儿子和非亲儿子吗?那是不可能的。其实这些年,我也做了很多研究。我把世界上七十来个国家,按照每个国家的国有经济的比重做一个分类,然后再看看这个国家的法制水平有什么差别。结果发现,国有经济比重越高的社会,法制就越不可能。这个道理其实很简单,在法官面前, In fact, now we still adhere to the public economy. Logically speaking, under such a basic economic system dominated by the public economy, how can state-owned enterprises and private enterprises be able to compete fairly and how could they have equal opportunities? It seems that I have several sons, a natural son and a non-relative Son, you can tell me that you should treat your pro-son and non-pro-son equally and equally. I will take your word seriously, but I really will treat my pro-son and non-pro-son equally? That is impossible. In fact, I also did a lot of research in these years. I classify 70 countries in the world according to the proportion of the state-owned economy in each country and then see if there is any difference in the legal system in this country. The results showed that the higher the proportion of state-owned economy, the more impossible the rule of law. This truth is actually very simple, in front of the judge,