诉讼活动的任务和它的性质要求诉讼程序完全公正。只有程序上的公正,才能保证准确地选择和适用法律,做到定性准确,量刑适当。 长期以来,西方法学家们也一直在探求程序公正的有关问题。他们根据无数次重复进行的审判实践所形成的经验以及反映出来的理性原则,对于程序公正的内涵和外延作了概括性的轮廓勾划,形成了几种有代表性的模式:理性化的公正模式、形式化的公正模式、主观上 The task of the litigation activity and its nature require that the proceedings be totally fair. Only procedural fairness can we ensure that we can accurately select and apply the law, achieve qualitative and accuracy, and appropriate sentencing. For a long time, western jurists have also been seeking relevant issues concerning procedural fairness. Based on the experience gained through numerous repeated trial practices and the rational principles reflected in them, they outlined the connotation and extension of procedural fairness and formulated several representative models: the rationalization of justice Mode, formal mode of fairness, subjectively