论文部分内容阅读
长期以来追赶理论将东亚模式和美、德的经验割裂开来,认为日本的工业化和现代化追赶是不连续的、引进的和外生的。长久以来被忽略的日本制糖业自明治维新到一战前50年发展的奇迹,却鲜明地提出了反例。通过批判地继承既有的殖民地发展论和发展型政府论,研究认为“日糖”奇迹的发生得益于两个层面的延续性:第一和第二产业间的“连续性”;在此基础上制度和技术上的“连续性”。进而通过反事实的推演表明,在两种连续性中,以根植在东亚社会所独具的人际网络中后者的作用更为关键。
For a long time, catching-up theory has split the East Asian model and the experience of the United States and Germany. They believe that the pursuit of industrialization and modernization in Japan is discontinuous, introduced and exogenous. The long-neglected Japanese sugar industry, since the Meiji Restoration to the miracle of 50 years before World War I, has clearly put forward counter-examples. By critically inheriting the existing theory of colonial development and developmental government, the study considers that the occurrence of the miracle of “Japanese sugar” benefits from the continuity of two levels: the “continuity” between the primary and secondary industries, On this basis, institutional and technical “continuity”. Furthermore, through counterfactual deduction, it is shown that in the two types of continuity, the role of the latter rooted in the unique social network of East Asian society is even more crucial.