论文部分内容阅读
本文尝试通过上海与新加坡控股公司模式比较,透视我国控股公司,特别是国有控股公司体制改革完善的有关问题。模式比较 1、基本框架相似与其它市场经济国家不同,新加坡的国有经济在整个国民经济中占有举足轻重的地位。新加坡政府对国有资产的管理也形成了自己独特的体系。政府对国有企业的管理是通过国有控股公司和某几个法定机构这一中间层次进行的。 (1)法定机构法定机构按照议会立法建立而运作,是独立的法人。它隶属于政府某部,该部拨付其
This article attempts to compare the model of Shanghai and Singapore holding companies, and perspective the related problems of the reform of the holding company in our country, especially the state-owned holding company. Comparison of modes 1. Similar to the basic framework Unlike other market economy countries, the state-owned economy in Singapore occupies a pivotal position in the entire national economy. The government of Singapore has also formed its own unique system of management of state assets. The administration of state-owned enterprises by the government is carried out at an intermediate level between state-owned holding companies and certain statutory bodies. (1) Statutory Bureaus Statutory Bureaus are independent legal persons that are established and operate in accordance with parliamentary legislation. It belongs to a government ministry, the ministry disbursed it