贵刊设“逻辑与语言病院”一栏,一例一议,剖析以逻辑错误为主的常见语病,实在是一个非常切实的好办法。从1982年第一、第二两期的情况看,该栏办得生动活泼,读后受益非浅。但有少数语病的分析是值得商榷的。这使我们觉得这个“病院”有必要明确建立“会诊制度”。“逻辑大夫”任“主治医生”是可以的,但也应该认真考虑“语言大夫”和“修辞大夫”的“诊断”。兹略举数例如下,以说明“会诊”之必要。 It is really a very good idea to publish a column entitled “Logical and Linguistic Hospitals” in your column, one case for one case and an analysis of the common language diseases that are mainly based on logical errors. From the situation of the first and second phases of 1982, the column can be lively and vivid, benefiting greatly from reading. However, the analysis of a few language diseases is debatable. This makes us think this “hospital” needs to be clearly established “consultation system.” It is okay for a “logical doctor” to be a “treating doctor,” but “diagnosis” by “rhetorician” and “rhetorician” should also be carefully considered. Let me cite a few examples below to illustrate the need for “consultation.”