论文部分内容阅读
问卷调查显示,我国公安机关取证仍在一定程度上存在“威胁、引诱、欺骗”现象,相关立法经历了“严排除,无配套措施”和“宽排除,有配套措施”两个阶段。大陆法系和英美法系对“威胁、引诱、欺骗”保持适度宽容。英美国家讯问方式由“肉体强制”向“心理强制”转变,排除标准由“刑讯违法程度”向“供述自愿程度”转变。在考察国内外司法实践的基础上,建议以是否“自愿”为标准,划分“威胁、引诱、欺骗”的类别,并引入判例制度,完善裁量规则。
According to the questionnaire survey, the evidence collection of public security organs in our country still exists the phenomenon of “threatening, inducing and deceiving” to a certain extent, and the relevant legislation has undergone “strict exclusion, no matching measures” and “wide exclusion” Two stages. The civil law system and Anglo-American law system are moderately tolerant of “threats, lure, deceit ”. The way of interrogation between the United States and the United States changed from “physical compulsion ” to “psychological compulsion ”, and the standard of exclusion was changed from “torture ” to “confession voluntarily ”. Based on the investigation of judicial practice both at home and abroad, it is suggested that the criterion of “voluntary” should be used to classify the categories of “threat, lure and cheat” and to introduce case law to improve the rules of discretion.