论文部分内容阅读
《学校体育》一九八九年第一期、第二期相继刊出了陈钢同志“体育教学过程中‘教师主导,学生主体’的提法不妥”和“再谈怎样认识体育教学中的主客体关系”两文。读后颇受教益,现就两文的一些观点谈淡我个人的不同看法,以求教于陈钢同志。体育教学的本质与学为主体陈文认为“教师和学生同样是‘进行认识活动和实践括动的人’,是相互依存的两个认识主体。”并进一步指出“教的主体是教师,客体是学生,教师发挥主导作用;学的主体是学生,学生进行认识和实践,发挥主体积极性作用。”一句话,就是认为体育教学活动中存在两个相互依存的认识主体。我们如何看待这一问题呢? 从本质上讲,体育教学是一种特殊的认识活动。它不同于一般的认识活动,从一般认识过程来讲就是
“School Physical Education” in 1989 the first and second issues have been published Comrade Chen Gang, “the teaching of physical education in the process of” teacher-led, student subject ’inappropriate formulation “and” to talk about how to understand physical education The relationship between subject and object “two articles. After reading, I learned a lot from my teaching, and now I talk about some different views of two articles about my own individual opinion in order to learn from Comrade Chen Gang. The essence of physical education and learning as the main Chen believes that ”teachers and students are also ’cognitive activities and practices of people who move’, are interdependent two cognitive body.“ And further pointed out that ”the main body of teaching is the teacher, the object Is the students, teachers play a leading role; the main body of learning is students, students recognize and practice, play a main role in the initiative. "In a word, that is, there are two interdependent cognitive subject in physical education activities. How do we think about this problem? In essence, physical education is a special cognitive activity. It is different from the general awareness of activities, from the general understanding of the process is