论文部分内容阅读
该赢的官司打输了,不能怪法官,或因告状告的不对路,或因答辩答的不在点儿。但是,必赢的官司——有理、有证据、有法律依据,却输了,很难理解。任何法律条文都有适用范围,扩大了范围,就会断出糊涂案;缩小了范围,该绳之以法的违法者,就可能逍遥法外。事实认定,应根据法律规定的有效证据来认定,随意采信或不采信,都会使法律天平蒙尘。下面的文章就是必赢的官司输了。案中适用的法律法规和对事实的认定出了偏差,如,对未完成的工程适用了已完成工程的条规。
The win’s lawsuit was lost, can not blame the judge, or because of the right to defend the wrong way, or because of the answer is not a little answer. However, the win-win lawsuit - reasonable, evidence, legal basis, but lost, it is difficult to understand. Any legal provisions have their scope of application. When the scope is expanded, the case of confusion will be broken; the scope will be narrowed; offenders who are brought to justice will be able to go unpunished. Facts should be based on valid evidence provided by law to identify, arbitrary letter or not, will make the legal balance dust. The following article is a win-lose lawsuit lost. The laws and regulations applicable to the case and the determination of the facts deviate from one another. For example, the regulations on completed projects have been applied to unfinished projects.