一在这个讲座中,我将论证指出,我给自己定的这个题目是一个糟糕的题目,一个树立了坏榜样的题目。“自由主义”与“保守主义”以及“社会主义”一样,是一个非常地方性的、偶然的和变化不定的术语,以至于不可能在一种有关社会、政治、政府和法律的一般理论中占有一席之地。因此在此种情形之下,我最好马上说,我所使用的“自由主义”这一术语所表达的主张(或一系列主张)与所有那些通常被称之为“自由主义的”主张是不同的,且经常相冲突。我的观点是:政府和法律应 In this seminar, I will argue that the topic I set for myself is a bad topic, one that sets a bad example. Like Liberalism and Socialism, “liberalism” is a very local, accidental and changing term that makes it impossible to define a social, political, governmental And the general theory of law have a place. So in that case, I’d better say right away that the term (or a series of assertions) I use in the term “liberalism” is synonymous with all those commonly referred to as “liberal” "Propositions are different and often conflict. My point is: government and law should be