论文部分内容阅读
目的探索心理干预在围绝经期综合征中的疗效。方法将符合围绝经期综合征诊断标准的68例患者随机分为研究组和对照组(研究组34人,对照组34人),对照组进行常规药物治疗,研究组在进行常规药物治疗的同时进行心理干预。于治疗前后分别采用症状自评量表(SCL-90),抑郁自评量表(SDS),焦虑自评量表(SAS)进行测评。结果对照组患者3例脱落,研究组4例脱落,其他患者均完成治疗全过程。研究组治疗前后SCL-90量表焦虑因子差值高于对照组(P<0.05);研究组治疗前后SAS、SDS标准分差值高于对照组(P<0.05)。结论与单纯的常规药物治疗相比,整合了心理干预的治疗方案对围绝经期综合征患者有更好的疗效。
Objective To explore the effect of psychological intervention in perimenopausal syndrome. Methods 68 patients with perimenopausal syndrome diagnostic criteria were randomly divided into study group and control group (study group 34, control group 34), the control group for conventional drug treatment, the study group in the conventional drug treatment Psychological intervention. Before and after treatment, the symptoms self-rating scale (SCL-90), depression self-rating scale (SDS) and anxiety self-rating scale (SAS) were used for evaluation. Results In the control group, 3 patients were exfoliated, 4 in the study group were exfoliated, and the rest of the patients completed the whole course of treatment. The difference of SCL-90 scale anxiety in study group before and after treatment was higher than that in control group (P <0.05). SAS and SDS standard difference in study group before and after treatment was higher than that in control group (P <0.05). Conclusion Compared with the simple routine drug treatment, the treatment plan integrating psychological intervention has a better curative effect on patients with perimenopausal syndrome.