论文部分内容阅读
内向性是学报与一般社会学术期刊相区别的质的规定性,它构成了学报的存在基础。学报对我国高等教育发展状况的反映功能,在很大程度上由它承担,抛弃或消弱学报的内向性是釜底抽薪之举。有人提出要学报摆出开放的姿态,走出校园,在竞争中寻求生存的价值,这种观点脱离了学报发展的本质要求,是在“进取”面具下对学报前途的悲观审视。但是做为出版物如果不通过竞争获取知名度(这里指本体价值的反映程度)就很难解决生存的难题。因此我们提出重新建构学报内向性原则。多年来,我们为获得社会对学报发展的关心和扶植而发出的呼吁从未间断过,但收效甚微,从根本上讲在于我们自
Introvertedness is the qualitative prescriptive difference between a journal and a general social academic journal, which forms the foundation for the existence of a journal. The journal’s reflection of the development of higher education in our country is largely borne by it. Abandoning or weakening the introversion of the journal is a drastic move. Some people put forward that the journal should be open-minded, go out of school and seek the value of survival in the competition. This view departs from the essential requirement of the development of the journal and is a pessimistic examination of the future of the journal under the mask of “enterprising”. However, as a publication, it is difficult to solve the problem of survival without gaining popularity through competition (in this case, the degree to which the value of the body is reflected). Therefore, we propose to reconstruct the principle of journal introversion. Over the years, our appeal for social concern and support for the development of journals has never ceased, but with little effect, and fundamentally lies in our self-