论文部分内容阅读
巴赫金和与巴赫金相联系的俄罗斯形式主义在中国已经没有了若干年前的兴盛。究其衰落的原因,则和巴赫金学派发展时期的一系列内忧外患不无关系,而招致这些纷扰的祸根乃是作为“新西学”之形式主义文论来到中国的那一天就存在的先天缺陷:即在对巴赫金是不是形式主义者这个问题上,以及对巴赫金学说的归化上众说纷纭,同时巴赫金主义的中国介绍者和接收者,始终惮于某些不可言说的原因,而无法把形式主义的概念、工具、体系详加参研阐述,从而造成了今天中国形式主义学派的萧条。如果能够克服这种与生俱来的隐忧,则形式主义学派在中国才不会是昙花一现。
Bakhtin and the Russian formalism associated with Bakhtin have not enjoyed a number of years of prosperity in China. The reason for its decline is not only related to a series of internal and external disturbances during the Bakhtin School’s development, but the root cause of these troubles is the day when the formalist literary theory of “New Western Learning” came to China The congenital defects of Bakhtin: that is, on the issue of whether Bakhtin is a formalist or not, and on the naturalization of Bakhtin’s doctrine, while Bakhtin’s Chinese introducer and recipient have always been afraid of certain unspeakable causes , But can not elaborate on the concepts, tools and systems of formalism in their study and study, thus causing the depression of the Chinese formalism school today. If we can overcome this innate hidden worries, the formalist school in China will not be short-lived.