论文部分内容阅读
实在论、反实在论的争论在哲学上是个理论问题,在实践上是个方法论的问题。理清反实在论对实在论主要反驳及其各自逻辑,可以为正确对待这个理论流派提供基础。反实在论的各种论证可以在逻辑上概括为三种层次:分别反驳实在论的论点、论据、论证。本文分别简要介绍这三种层次中影响较大的反驳。
The argument of realism and anti-realism is a philosophical issue of theory, which is a matter of methodology in practice. Sorting out the main refutations of realism and their respective logic in anti-realism can provide the basis for proper treatment of this theoretical school of thought. The various arguments of anti-realism can be logically summed up in three levels: to refute the arguments, argument and argument of realism respectively. This article briefly introduces the more influential refutations of these three levels.