论文部分内容阅读
举证责任是三大诉讼法中的一个重要问题。诉讼中对立的双方围绕相关的争点提供证据,结合实践中双方当事人为达到胜诉的目的,不断提出新的主张、新的证据,构成了学者解说和分析举证责任的基础。我国现行的《行政诉讼法》关于被告承担举证责任的规定,深刻反映了我国行政诉讼侧重保护个人、组织的权益和导向法治行政的基本取向。拟从举证责任的界定入手,立足我国社会现实和法律环境,肯定《行政诉讼法》对被告承担举证责任的规定是符合我国现阶段的要求的,并重点探讨关于原告承担举证责任问题的若干争议。
The burden of proof is an important issue in the three major procedural laws. The two opposing parties in the litigation provide evidences on the related issues. In the light of the fact that both parties, in practice, aim at winning the favor, they constantly come up with new ideas and new evidences, which form the basis for the scholars to explain and analyze the burden of proof. Our current “Administrative Procedure Law” on the defendant to bear the burden of proof provides a profound reflection of our administrative litigation focused on protecting the rights and interests of individuals, organizations and the basic orientation of the rule of law. Starting from the definition of the burden of proof and based on the social reality and legal environment in our country, it is affirmed that the provisions of the Administrative Procedure Law on the respondent’s burden of proof meet the requirements of the present stage in our country and focus on some controversies over the plaintiff’s burden of proof .