论文部分内容阅读
有人认为,私有企业主的财产用于私人消费的部分只占很小比例,实际上是为社会所用,是所谓“不占有生产资料但却享受其效用”的“间接所有制”。据此,一方面主张不能说私有经济只“姓私”;另一方面却说国有经济是“官有”的,“损害所有人的利益”。“间接所有制”弄不清所有制内部产权体系的结构和层次,割裂了“所有”和“使用”的关系,混淆了产权主体,是出于对产权基本理论无知而杜撰的伪范畴,当然严重背离经济生活的现实。本文运用产权理论,对照社会现实,剖析它的错误和欺骗性,指出其目的是为了美化资本主义私有经济,贬低社会主义国有经济,为进一步推行私有化制造舆论。
Some people think that private ownership of private property for private consumption only accounts for a small proportion, which is actually used by society and is the so-called “indirect ownership ” that does not take up the means of production but enjoys its utility. “ Therefore, on the one hand, we can not claim that the private economy only has ”private name “; on the other hand, it states that the state-owned economy is ”official “, ”damaging the interests of all “. ”Indirect Ownership “ can not figure out the structure and hierarchy of the ownership system of internal ownership, and divides the relationship between ”all “ and ”use " and confuses the main body of property rights out of the ignorance of the basic theory of property rights Pseudo categories, of course, a serious departure from the reality of economic life. This article uses the theory of property rights, analyzes the social reality and analyzes its mistakes and deceptiveness. It points out that its purpose is to beautify the capitalist private economy, belittle the socialist state-owned economy and create public opinion for the further privatization.