去年初夏,有一家印数不小的报纸,在刊出一篇谈“反腐”的言论后,受到了《中国青年报》的批评,被指提出的“可以允许适度腐败”的观点是为贪官开脱,并为反腐不力作辩解。这是一种公开的争鸣,读者很感兴趣,也想知道那家报纸怎么回应。批评的话是否站得住脚,被批评者本意是否如批评所言,只要双方一碰撞,就容易看清楚了。但那家报纸装聋作哑,对批评听而不闻。过了不久,《中国青年报》再次刊文批评该报,它还是不吭一声。这是怎么回事?办报要耳听六路,眼观八方, In the early summer of last year, a newspaper with a large print count was criticized by the “China Youth Daily” after it published an article on “anti-corruption.” It was suggested that “moderate corruption be allowed.” The point of view is to extirpate corrupt officials and to justify the ineffectiveness in fighting corruption. This is a public debate, the reader is very interested, but also want to know how the newspaper responded. It is easy to see if the criticisms are sound and if the critics are as critical as they are criticized. But the newspaper was deaf and deaf to hearing about criticism. Soon after, “China Youth Daily” published an article criticizing the newspaper again, but it still did not say anything. This is how the case? Reporter ear to listen to six, eyes P Plus,