作者同意B.M.西尼村的意见,认为中国地台是中国东部的一个大的构造单位,它是在吕梁运动后造成的。中国地台由两个主要部分构成,它的北部称中朝地台,南部称华南地台。中国地台有一很重要的特征,就是一个“活化”的地台。华南地台的东南部“活化”尤其强烈而显著,在中生代的太平洋运动时,差不多具有类似地槽的特征。但是它的“活化”是有悠久历史的,即开始於震旦纪,所以加里东运动给与很大的影响,但加里东运动只是地台内部的褶皱。地台“活化”直到中生代太平洋运动才得到高度发展,产生巨大的火成活动以及“中国式”的构造型式。新生代时地台还有中等强度的运动和火成活动。自第四纪冰期之后,地台仍在较弱的升降运动中。华南地台无论从沉积岩相、区域变质及火成活动,或从山字型、华夏式及南岭东西褶皱的构造体系等构造型式发育史的研究,都可以看到它的“活化”过程,在这过程里发育了“过渡类型”的构造形态,这都是不同放地槽或地台的构造形态的。本文是作为学习心得性质的初步尝试,文中不成熟和谬误之处尚多,希望得到大家的指正。如果能在集体的讨论和研究之下将我国大地构造研究清楚的话,这是作者所衷心期望的。 The author agrees with B.M. Sinny’s opinion that the Chinese platform is a large tectonic unit in eastern China that was created after the Luliang movement. The Chinese platform is made up of two main parts, the northern part of which is called the China-DPRK terraces and the southern part the southern China terraces. China’s platform has a very important feature is an “activated” platform. The “activation” of the southeastern part of the southern China platform is especially strong and significant, with similar trough-like features during the Mesozoic Pacific Ocean movement. However, its “activation” has a long history, that is, beginning in the Sinian, so the Caledonian movement has a great impact, but the Caledonian movement is only the crease inside the platform. The “activation” of the platform did not get a great development until the Mesozoic Pacific Movement, resulting in a huge exhumation and “Chinese style” structure. During the Cenozoic, there were also moderate-intensity exercises and exhumations. Since the Quaternary ice age, the platform is still in the weaker movements. The South China platform can see its “activation” process both from sedimentary facies, regional metamorphism and intrusive activity, or from the research on the structural development history of the mountain type, Huaxia type and Nanling east-west fold system, During this process, the “transitional type” tectonic forms were developed, all of which are of different tectonic settings of earth slips or platforms. This article is a preliminary attempt to learn the nature of the experience. There are still many unhealthy and fallacious points in the text, hoping to get everyone correct. It is the author’s heartfelt hope that if we can make a clear study of the tectonics in our country under collective discussion and research,