论文部分内容阅读
【案情】原告:黄勇。被告:中国证券监督管理委员会。 2006年11月29日,中国证券监督管理委员会作出证监罚字(2006)第34号行政处罚决定书(以下简称第34号处罚决定)。该决定认定:截至2005年3月18日,广东省深圳和光商务股份有限公司(以下简称和光商务公司)共有14笔债务被债权人诉讼或提起仲裁.涉及诉讼和仲裁金额为87322万元,占公司净资产的268%,该公司对上述诉讼和仲裁事项均未及时披露。和光商务公司的上述行为违反了1998年颁布的证券法(以下简称原证券法)第六十二条的规定,构成了原证券法第一百七十七
【Case】 Plaintiff: Huang Yong. Defendant: China Securities Regulatory Commission. On November 29, 2006, China Securities Regulatory Commission made the decision of Administrative Punishment No. 34 (2006) No. 34 (hereinafter referred to as punishment No. 34). The decision concluded that as of March 18, 2005, a total of 14 debts of Shenzhen Hikvision Commerce Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Wako Commerce Co., Ltd.) were brought by the creditors or arbitration proceedings involving litigation and arbitration amounted to 873.22 million yuan, 268% of net assets, the company did not promptly disclose the above litigation and arbitration matters. The aforesaid acts of Wako Commerce Co., Ltd., in violation of the provisions of Article 62 of the Securities Law (hereinafter referred to as “the former securities law”) promulgated in 1998, constitute the one-hundred-seventh