《论语》《侍坐》章中,孔子令弟子们各言其志,却唯独倾心于曾皙的回答。孔子何以“与点”?这已成为“两千年来争论不决的一件公案”(徐复观语)。前人的说法多是猜测:何晏《论语注》引周氏语曰:“善点独知时。”邢昺疏曰:“善其独知时而不求为政也。”这本来是合乎情理的推测,刘宝楠《论语正义》却将其批驳一通:“若以《鲁论》所说,则点有遗世之意,不特异三子,并与孔子问意反矣。”他硬说曾皙是要用音乐去和谐“民声”:“盖三子者之撰,礼节民 “Analects of Confucius”, “waiter” chapter, Confucius make disciples speak their minds, but only enamored of Zeng Xi’s answer. Why does Confucius “and point”? This has become “a controversy over two thousand years a case of public law” (Xu Fu Guanyu). His predecessors are mostly speculation: He Yan “Analects of Confucius” cited Zhou’s words: “When a good thing alone.” Xing Shu said: “Good at its own time and not for politics.” It had been reasonable , Liu Baonan’s The Analects of Confucian Analects criticizes Yi Tong: “If we say” Lu, “we have the meaning of the past, the non-specific three, and the desire of Confucius.” He insisted Xi is to use music to harmony “Voice”: "Cover three of those essays, courtesy and civilians