论文部分内容阅读
车库车位产权,从没有像今年4月这样备受关注:南京市星汉城市花园业委会的一桩地下车库产权案件一审判决在全国广为转载。南京市鼓楼区法院迅速就此正式发布官微澄清:广为转载的该一审判决并非生效判决,在该案经过重申生效的判决中,援引了2004年12月15日南京市《商品房附属房屋转让等问题的若干规定(试行)》中“应有不低于15%(最低6个)的车库为业主保留”的规定,判决开发商为此向业委会移交相应业主共有的车库,并向业委会赔偿已出售给小区其他业主的车库对应价款50万元。
Garage parking spaces property rights, never like this year in April so much attention: Nanjing Xinghan City Garden Industry Committee an underground garage property rights case first instance verdict widely reproduced in the country. Nanjing Drum Tower District Court quickly released on this official micro-clarification: widely reprinted the first instance verdict is not a valid verdict, the case reiterated the entry into force of the decision, citing the December 15, 2004 in Nanjing, “commercial housing subsidiary transfer of housing, etc. (Provisional) ”in the “ should be not less than 15% (minimum 6) of the garage reserved for the owners ”, the developer decided to transfer the owners of the corresponding owners of the garage for this and To the industry committee compensation has been sold to other owners of the garage corresponding price of 500,000 yuan.