论文部分内容阅读
文献[9]以定量研究的方法,论证了有关内燃机动力性能的评价指标之一-适应性和适应性系数-在理论上的谬误.所用的具体例子是一台汽油机汽车,计算方式是手算.为了从更广泛的角度验证文献[9]的结论的正确性,本文用电子计算机广泛地验算了包括汽油机和柴油机的各种车型:小客车、轻型载重车、中型载重车和重型载重车.计算结果为文献[9]提供了更广泛和深刻的证据.据此认为在我们的各种内燃机论著和生产实践中继续保留和使用这个与实际脱离的指标是不恰当的.
In a quantitative study, the literature [9] demonstrated the theoretical fallacy of one of the evaluation indexes on the dynamic performance of an internal combustion engine, the adaptability and the adaptive coefficient, and the specific example used was a gasoline engine car, calculated in hand In order to verify the validity of the conclusion of the literature [9] from a wider perspective, this paper uses computers to examine a wide range of vehicles including gasoline and diesel engines: passenger cars, light trucks, medium trucks and heavy trucks. The results provide more extensive and profound evidence for the literature [9], which concludes that it is not appropriate to keep and use this indicator of actual disengagement in our various internal combustion engine research and production practices.