在司法实践中，对于什么是审查批捕中的错案以及衡量错案的标准存在着不同的认识，给实际操作带来了一定的影响。本文在评述各种观点的基础上提出了自己的看法：衡量是否属于“错捕”的标准有两条：一是《刑事诉讼法》第六十条规定的逮捕条件，这是法定标准；二是具体案件的事实与证据，这是事实标准。具体地说，不能认为批捕后作了无罪处理的案件，就一定是审查批捕之错案，而应当具体案件具体分析，以逮捕条件和具体案件事实与证据为标准来审查确认“批捕决定”和“不捕决定”的对错 In judicial practice, there is a different understanding of what is the wrong way of examining and approving arrests and the standard of misjudgment, which has an impact on the practical operation. This article puts forward my own opinions on the basis of reviewing various opinions: There are two criteria for measuring whether it falls under the category of “wrong catch”: first, the conditions for arrest as stipulated in Article 60 of the Criminal Procedure Law, which is the legal standard; It is the de facto standard that is the facts and evidence of a specific case. Specifically, it can not be considered that after the arrest and arrest, the case of innocent treatment must be the examination and approval of the wrong case, but should be a specific analysis of specific cases, the arrest conditions and the facts and evidence of specific cases as the standard to examine and verify the “arrest decision” and “Do not catch the decision” right or wrong