论文部分内容阅读
郭沫若批评沈从文之缘由与得失,迄今未有定论。通过对历史语境的呈现与相关文本的解读,笔者细致考察了1946—1948年间郭沫若对沈从文的四次批评。郭沫若对沈从文的批评,不是局限于文艺圈内的局部事件,而是牵涉到国共双方、以民盟为代表的第三方面力量、主要报刊杂志等当时中国最具影响力的各种势力,更涉及近代知识分子对中国命运的思考与相关实践,对当下知识分子思索相关问题仍具现实意义。
Guo Moruo criticized Shen Congwen’s causes and gains and losses, so far not conclusive. Through the presentation of the historical context and the related texts, the author carefully examines the four criticisms of Guo Moruo toward Shen Congwen from 1946 to 1948. Guo’s criticism of Shen Congwen was not confined to the local events in the cultural circle but to the third party forces represented by the KMT and the CPC, represented by the NLD, the major newspapers and magazines, and other influential forces of the time in China. Concerning the thinking and practice of modern intellectuals on the fate of China, it is still of practical significance for contemporary intellectuals to think about relevant issues.