论文部分内容阅读
读了九月号《江西医药》刊登的“农村人民公社医院病例討論”一文后,有很多感受。过去,医学杂志很少刊登农村作者的稿件,刊登农村医院病例討論,則更属罕見。原因之一,是农村医院的病案討論,沒有城市医院那一套“科学”的“常規”,所以不被人們所重視。《江西医药》杂志把病例討論从城市大医院的整套“常規”中解放出来,从而使农村人民公社医院的病例討論,在刊物上有了地盘,这是一个很好的創举。在过去,所有医学刊物发表的病例討論,都离不了一大套“常規”,认为这是病例討論的“依据”,有条件的城市医院,这样做固然无可厚非。
After reading the article “Case Discussion in Rural People’s Commune Hospital” published in the September issue of “Jiangxi Medicine”, there are many feelings. In the past, medical journals seldom published manuscripts from rural writers, and it was even rarer to publish case reports in rural hospitals. One of the reasons is that the discussion of medical records in rural hospitals does not include the “scientific” “convention” of urban hospitals, so it is not valued by people. “Jiangxi Medicine” magazine liberated the case discussion from the set of “conventional” of the big city hospitals, thereby making case discussions in rural people’s commune hospitals and having a site in the publications. This is a good initiative. In the past, all the medical publications published in the case discussions could not be separated from a large set of “conventional”, which is considered to be the “grounds” for case discussions. Conditional urban hospitals are of course understandable.