风险社会下,政府作为治理者的职能愈加凸显。组织开展重大决策社会稳定风险评估(简称“稳评”),旨在知晓公共政策和项目对社会稳定潜在威胁的程度。本研究以稳评制度为对象,以其中“评估主体”规定为重点。使用可评估性评价方法,认为相关规定存在三个主要问题,包括评估主体的政策安排不科学,实施稳评中缺少支持性政策,及引入私人部门和社会主体承担稳评的制度不完善。建议加强稳评制度目标对评估主体规定的指导作用,细化重大决策类型,分类确定评估主体来源;出台程序规定,增加政策评估资金投入;规范外包费用支付,激励多元主体实施稳评。 Under the risk society, the function of the government as governor becomes more and more prominent. The organization conducts a major policy-making on social stability risk assessment (“stable rating”) aimed at knowing the extent to which public policies and projects are potentially threatening social stability. In this study, the steady assessment system as the object, with “evaluation subject ” as the focus. There are three main problems in the relevant regulations, including the unscientific policy arrangement of the assessment body, the lack of supportive policies in the implementation of the steady assessment and the imperfection of the system introduced by the private sector and the social body to undertake the steady assessment. It is suggested that the objective of the system of stable assessment should be to strengthen the guiding role of the main body of evaluation, refine the types of major decisions and classify the sources of the main bodies of assessment. Procedures should be promulgated to increase investment in policy assessment, regulate payment of outsourcing fees and encourage stable implementation of multiple subjects.