论文部分内容阅读
各种名目的“评好新闻”这两年不断涌现,令人眼花。什么水利好新闻、气象好新闻、土地管理好新闻、教育好新闻……要是开列个单子,够您瞧几分钟的。各行各业都搞起好新闻评选,利乎?弊乎?各行各业重视新闻工作,岂不是好事?但是从另一个角度讲,问题就来了。什么是“新闻”?什么又是“好新闻”?新闻界对此还终日争论不休,政府其他不从事新闻工作的官员们能担负起评好新闻的重任?难免让人生疑。难道真如那句俗话说,“旁观者清,当事者迷”吗?有人不客气地注释:什么是“行业好新闻”?就是经常为某部门说说好话,为其扬扬知名度的就是好新闻。你写篇秕评稿试试看,即使批评到“点子”上,你的文章写得再好,恐怕也评不上好新闻。笔者曾亲耳听到一位政府部门的官员放话:“我们评×××记者的稿子为×等
Various names of “good news” in the past two years continue to emerge, dazzling. What good water news, good weather news, land management good news, good news education ... ... If you have a list, enough for you to see a few minutes. All walks of life have to carry out a good news selection, the benefits? Adverse disadvantages? All walks of life attach importance to news work, would not it be a good thing? But from another perspective, the problem is coming. What is “news”? What is “good news?” The press has long been debating this endlessly. Other government officials who are not involved in the work of journalism can shoulder the heavy responsibility of appraising the news. Is it true that the saying goes, “Bystanders clear, the parties fans”? Someone bluntly comment: What is “good news industry?” Is often say good words for a department, its reputation is good news. You write articles 秕 referee try, even if the criticism of “ideas”, your article no matter how good, I am afraid not comment on good news. I have personally heard a government official release: "We comment × × × reporter’s draft for × and so on