论文部分内容阅读
运用抽象与具体这种具有普遍性的哲学范畴来看待当前的哲学改革,则可看到,对马克思主义哲学形态之实践唯物主义的提出,反对者一是将辩证唯物主义提升为并不存在的“一般的”唯物主义,而压抑新近提出的具体存在的“实践的”唯物主义;二是无视具体形态的各种唯物主义的各自丰富规定性,而用辩证唯物主义取代实践唯物主义。此两种作法违背了抽象与具体这对范畴的辩证关系,从而有碍于马克思主义哲学形态的深入探讨。
When we look at the current philosophical reform by using abstract and concrete philosophical categories of such universality, we can see that the proposition of the practical materialism of the Marxist philosophical form is that opponents first promote dialectical materialism as non-existent “General” materialism, while suppressing the newly-proposed concrete existence of “practical” materialism; second, ignoring the richness and stipulation of various materialisms of specific forms and substituting dialectical materialism for practical materialism. These two practices violate the dialectical relationship between abstraction and specific categories, thus impeding the further exploration of Marxist philosophical forms.