引言總的看來,由於我國外觀設計法律保護起步較晚,較長一段時間内並無太多有關外觀設計侵權判定的專門性研究,其所借鑒的行政審查規定也曆經數次修改,加之外觀設計本身就具有較强的不確定性,因此司法實踐中對於外觀設計侵權判定的態度一直較爲模糊,没有一個明確的判断準則,缺乏穩定性。在外觀設計侵權判定問题上,司法實踐一直採用的是“整體觀察、綜合判斷”的方法,而在具體的判斷過程中,裁判者需要重點從“設計要點”和“設計要部”這兩方面出發考量專利設 Foreword In general, due to the late start of the legal protection of design in our country, there is not much research on the judgments of design infringement for a long period of time. The administrative examination regulations borrowed by it have also been revised several times. Design itself has a strong uncertainty, so the judiciary in the design of the judgments on the design of infringement has been rather vague, there is no clear criterion, the lack of stability. Judicial practices have always adopted the method of “overall observation and comprehensive judgment” in the judgment of design infringement. In the specific judgment process, the judges need to focus on the key points of design points and design points Department "Considering these two aspects set the patent set