论文部分内容阅读
《四川档案》一九八四年第二期发表了黄存勋同志的《试论档案史料的真实可靠性问题》,读后获益不少,同时又觉得有些问题还需要提出来商讨。 一、可否断言档案是历史的真实记录 黄存勋同志说:“简单地断言档案史料是历史的真实记录,这种说法是值得商(榷)的”。语意委婉含蓄,不过联系该文的第一句“档案是历史的记录”来看,意思还是明确的,即只能断言档案是历史的记录,不可断言是真实记录。 我认为,档案是历史的真实记录,理
The Sichuan Archives published the second issue of Comrade Huang Cunxun’s “Truth about the Authenticity of Archives and Historical Materials” in the second issue of 1984, and received many benefits after reading it. At the same time, some issues need to be discussed. First, can we assert that the archives is a true record of history? Comrade Huang Cun-hsun said: “Simply asserting that the historical records of archives is a true record of history is an argument worthy of discussion.” The meaning of sentiment is subtle and implicit. However, in connection with the first sentence of the article, “the record is a record of history”, the meaning is still clear. That is to say, the record can only be asserted that the record is a historical record and can not be asserted as a true record. In my opinion, the file is a true record of history